Skip to main content

FEET TO THE FIRE

To ensure the elected do what's expected

Home
About FTTF
An American Invocation
How We Work
A21 training
A21 Stories
A21 Petition
Agenda 21
Resolution
A hoax or reality?
Sustainability and the UN
Stilll not convinced?
Excerpts from SCREWED
Tin Foil Hats
The fallacy of Green Ener
A21 extract from RNC plat
Leave the UN now!
The Global Warming Hoax a
Smart Meters
American Policy Ins on Sm
States opt for their Citi
Missouri Agenda 21 legisl
Alabama tough on A21
Arizona--Anti UN A21 bill
LEARNING
Resistance
Benefit Corporations
Petition Agaist Foreign L
Time to leave the UN
Regionalism the heart of
LEG questions
Essential Constitution
USURPATION--wrong track
Timely Articles
Common Core
Take Action Now
Related Links
Contact Us

Dr. Dan Eichenbaum dispels any notion of the tin foil hat

 

 

As a constitutionalist and patriot, I have consistently championed the constitutional concepts of limited government, individual freedom, free market economy, personal responsibility, and private property ownership.  As proven throughout history, the right to own private property that cannot be arbitrarily confiscated by the government is the source of individual freedom.  Karl Marx, the founder of Communism, was asked what he considered to be the single most important objective necessary for worldwide Communism to become a reality.  In response, he stated that for Communism to succeed required the elimination of private property rights.

 

Over the past few years, I have been speaking out against the UN’s Agenda 21 along with other issues of importance.  If I had given these presentations about Agenda 21 five years ago, someone would have run out and put a tin foil hat on my head.  The implication would have been that people who buy into conspiracy theories are paranoid nutcases who should be ignored by the sane majority.

 

Twenty years have passed since the Agenda 21 plan was adopted at the United Nation’s Conference of Rio in 1992.  Abundant original documentation confirming every aspect of this program is readily available from a variety of sources, including the United Nation’s own website.  You may agree or disagree with its goals and methods, but no logical person who has investigated Agenda 21 can conclude that it is a conspiracy theory without basis in fact.

 

Agenda 21 is, unfortunately, all too real.

 

Yes, the globalization of trade, communications, travel, and lifestyle is a natural product of the technology revolution, and it is, in fact, inevitable and a benefit for all humanity.

 

Simple economic globalization, however, is not the goal of the UN’s arrogant elitists.  They seek to use Agenda 21 to impose a socialist, redistributive one world government under the UN banner.  If you doubt this, listen to the words of those who advocate for Agenda 21, read the international treaties submitted for ratification, and study the proposals planned for the Rio+20 conference this year.  In every instance, the Natural Law rights of individuals are replaced by international communal rights, national sovereignty is obliterated, and wealth is to be limited and redistributed globally.

 

There are those that acknowledge the reality of Agenda 21 but say that globalization is inevitable, it has been coming on for decades, and all should just accept it.

 

Agenda 21 is like a snowball rolling down the mountain toward a village at the bottom.  It starts out small moving slowly at the top but rapidly grows in size and increases in speed as it heads toward the village.  An observer might say, “It is inevitable that the village will be destroyed by the oncoming avalanche, so why try to prevent the disaster?”

 

Did our Founders just stand by and accept the growing tyranny of King George in 1776?